Solana (SOL) Not Able to Hype Due to Uptime Issues and Suspicion of Decentralization

Looks like EOS is enjoying the support of the Google brand.  Google Cloud Hands on Labs powered by Qwiklabs which has been developed with their partner Block.one facilitates self-paced labs.

This lab will extend the single node EOSIO blockchain to use multiple nodes. Users can install various EOSIO software components to set up multi-node EOSIO blockchain. Finally, perform some node operator tasks on the new EOSIO blockchain.  Not to deny, the collaborations in the EOSIO Open Source technology community is phenomenal.

Solana continues to suffer from the tainted image it imprinted on its users when it went down.  It went down for 3 times in less than 6 months.

Reportedly, Solana went down again at two o’clock in the morning (UTC+8) on January 4th. The attacker has been suspected of using spam to conduct a DDoS attack.  The Solana community blames it on a DDOS attack.

It just seems to be very hard for Solana to erase that they need to off and on periodically.

Altcoin Daily shared: “Solana is everything that EOS wanted to be.”

Those who have skin in the game well know what the true capabilities of SOL and EOS are.  It is only those who have invested their money and experience the transaction situation real time will be able to tell.

Mixed Reactions from the Community Members:  Everyone with a deeper technical understanding of the two knows how big fundamental differences are. Not saying Solana is bad, but EOS never wanted to be something like Solana and will never try to for diverse reasons.

Google Cloud is with EOS.  Fast, cheap, and proof-of-stake also everything Eth 2.0 wants to be.

Once the pressure is as much as it is on ETH right now with increasing traffic EOS will end up in operation theatre for a lifetime.

Solana is a good project and I do own it, but to be brutally honest it doesn’t deserve the hype until it achieves the pre-requisite feature i.e., decentralization without which there are 1000 times better-centralized protocols and apps already existing.

And, ALGO is everything that SOL wants to be.

SOL is a centralized hype coin that needs to be turned off and on again to keep working.

EOS is feeless – Solana is not. Solana is more centralized too. Not to worry, just need to switch it on and off every now and then when it fails.  It will get there.

Except for Decentralized, Solana is way better than what EOS wanted to be.

If you say so. But, for setting the record straight, EOS is a 3-year battle-tested, decentralized, community-driven blockchain.

I bought a few EOS, got told it would be worth a bit in the summer.

A centralized fake blockchain with admins that turn the on/off switch weekly? We also don’t want to mention the hidden coins the developers have do we?

OG blockchains are like that, put some respect on EOS.

So, you meant to say EOS wants to be a centralized project geared towards the VCs wants and desires?  It is a rushed to market blockchain to over inflate.  It is extremely overvalued.  It is a blockchain which has security breaches and constant congestion and slowdowns? Mean to say that’s what EOS wanted to be?

I don’t think EOS wanted a shutoff switch or shady Tokenomics. Did you mention EOS didn’t want to be centralized either?

If Solana can have an uptime of 100% but it doesn’t have 100% run time, does it?

And even with all its problems, Harmony ONE is still going to eat both their lunches.

I Don’t believe EOS turned off every other week, but it is equally controlled by the ultra-rich.

SOL Centralized and going offline every other week?  Solana is everything that the VC’s wanted it to be.

EOS scammed everyone off their ICO money and they are very centralized.

Solana’s centralization is no different than the current thing we have with FIAT.  Solana is everything that EOS wanted to be, but it crashes.

Solana = EOS 2.0 indeed but still a failure.

Solana is better than EOS and LUNA.

Post Views:
20